译文/Translated：
【通信产业网讯】12月5日，中国电子信息产业发展研究院(赛迪研究院)发布第15期赛迪全球公有链技术评估指数，对全球35条知名公有链从技术维度进行综合考量并给出排名。
本期评估中，Waves、达世币、科莫多相继进行了重要产品的发布，对原有底层逻辑进行升级，本次排名分别提升7位、5位、5位。NEO相继上线了新测试网并发布 NEO3 Preview1、Neo-Plugin-v2.10.3、NeoLine 移动端钱包安卓端发布 V1.0.2等重大更新，大量代码得到改进，优化了运行性能及算法。NEO本期指数上升5位，排名第6名。
评估结果显示，全球三大Dapp平台EOS、以太坊、波场保持位列榜单前三位，得分分别为151.4、138.0和137.8，第一阵营综合指数得分领先明显。排名第4位至第11位的分别为纳世链、应用链、NEO、斯蒂姆链、比特股、比特币、恒星链、星云链，综合指数均在100分以上。其中，比特币综合得分为103.9，在全部35条评估公有链中排名第9位，较上期上升5个位次。
基础技术主要评估公有链的技术实现水平，主要考察公有链的功能，性能，安全性以及去中心化等指标。基础技术分项指数方面，EOS和波场依然占据第一和第二名，斯蒂姆链上升1名来到第三名，第四名和第五名分别为比特股和纳世链。Cosmos、以太经典、达世、小蚁上升较为明显，分比上升12名、9名、6名、6名。基础技术分项指数平均值较前期变化不大。
应用性主要评估公有链实际支持应用的综合水平，包括节点部署，钱包应用，开发支持与应用实现四个方面。应用性分项指数方面，以太坊上升2名来到应用性指数榜首，NEO、波场、纳世链、和本体紧随其后，分别处于第二、三、四、五名。去中心化应用开发平台(DApp)得分较高，如以太坊和小蚁，位居前两名。纳世链、Tezos、埃欧塔上升较为明显，分比上升10名、10名、8名。总体应用性指数平均值较上期明显上升。
创新力主要考察公有链的持续创新情况，包括开发人员规模，代码更新情况和代码影响力。创新力方面，排名前五名的分别为比特币、以太坊、应用链、EOS和门罗。科莫多、ZEC、小蚁上升较为明显，分比上升16名、5名、5名。总体创新力平均指数同上期相比有小幅度上升。
据悉，赛迪全球公有链技术评估工作自2018年初开始实施，由中国电子信息产业发展研究院下属的赛迪(青岛)区块链研究院组织实施，赛迪智库产业软件研究所、赛迪智库网络安全研究所、中国软件评测新中心、《网络空间安全》杂志等共同参与，评估结果每两个月发布一次。
原文/Original：
www.ccid.com: China Center for Information Industry Development (CCID) has released the 15th global public blockchain technology assessment index, giving a comprehensive assessment from the technical aspect and the rankings of 35 world-famous public blockchains.
In this assessment, Waves, Dash, Komodo, which have launched important products and improved their original base-layer logic, witnessed improvements in the ranking by 7 points, 5 points, and 5 points respectively. NEO has launched a new testnet, NEO3 Preview1, and Neo-Plugin-v2.10.3. Also, NeoLine mobile wallet for Android has released version 1.0.2. Together with other important updates, these improvements have simplified codes and optimize performance and algorithm. NEO has therefore moved by five point to rank the sixth.
According to this assessment, the three major Dapp platforms–EOS, Ethereum, and TRON—have remained on top, with total index at 151.4, 138.0, and 137.8, this leading group far exceeding others. Ranking the 4th to the 11th are NULS,Lisk, NEO, STEEM, BitShares, Bitcoin, XLM, and Nebulas, with total index all above 100. Among them, the index for Bitcoin is 103.9, ranking the ninth in all the 35 public blockchains being assessed, a five-point improvement compared with the previous assessment.
Basic-tech has focused on technology readiness, which assess the functions, performance, security, and decentralized levels. In this aspect, EOS and TRON rank the top, followed by STEEM (which has seen a one point upward), BitShares and NULS. Cosmos, Ethereum Classic, Dash, neo have witnessed notable improvements, with improvements of 12 points, 9 points, 6 points, and 6 points each. The average index in the aspect of basic-tech has little changes from the previous one.
Applicability focuses on the overall support of different public blockchains on applications, including the deployment of nodes, wallets, development support and realization of apps. Here, Ethereum has improved by two points to the top, followed by NEO, TRON, NULS, and Ontology. DApp platforms have scored higher, for example, Ethereum and neo, which have been the top two. NULS, Tezos, IOTA have all seen impressive increases, going upward by 10 points, 10 points, and 8 points respectively. The overall average index has gained noticeable improvements over the previous assessment.
Creativity assesses the continual creativity, including the scale of developers, coding updates, and coding influences. In this aspect, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Lisk, EOS, and Monero rank the top 5. Komodo, ZEC, and neo have gained considerable improvement, with index increasing by 16 points, 5 points, and 5 points. Overall, the average index in this field has enjoyed a little improvement.
The assessment of global public blockchains by CCID started from the beginning of 2018, carried out by CCID (Qingdao) blockchain research institute, a subdivision of China Center for Information Industry Development, and jointly participated by CCIDwise industry software research institute, CCIDwise cyberspace security research institute, China Information Technology Security Evaluation Center, Cyberspace Security, etc. Assessments are released on a bimonthly basis.
原文链接/Original URL:
